[BUSINESS] Mastercard says no more automatic billing after a free trial

[24alex]

I looked to see if Visa wil do a similar move and could not find anything, any of you here know if Visa has announced a similar rule.

[TerryLon]

I looked to see if Visa wil do a similar move and could not find anything, any of you here know if Visa has announced a similar rule.

I tried to research and found nothing

[DanielGrola]

I wonder how programs are taking this news, any resp here that have an opinion.

[STICK]

This can be good for business. It can cut down on charge backs and refunds.

[Terry]

This can be good for business. It can cut down on charge backs and refunds.

You might be right

[vblogger]

This can be good for business. It can cut down on charge backs and refunds.

Are you on drugs, no it is not good for re-bills period.

[pussyhunter]

No it is defo not good for sales or recurring sales period.

[gotonudecom]

Somebody fix this thread. No one is reading the article and the majority of the comments are WRONG!

This does not affect the adult industry.

[gotonudecom]

I swear I posted on here the other day that this entire thread has been mislead.
I can not find my post now. Sorry I must have screwed up and not posted it.

Go read the article. All of it.

DOES NOT AFFECT US AT ALL

*This blog was updated on January 17, 2019 to clarify that the rule change is applicable to physical products such as skincare, healthcare items etc.

[Toons-man]

I swear I posted on here the other day that this entire thread has been mislead.
I can not find my post now. Sorry I must have screwed up and not posted it.

Go read the article. All of it.

DOES NOT AFFECT US AT ALL

*This blog was updated on January 17, 2019 to clarify that the rule change is applicable to physical products such as skincare, healthcare items etc.

what you mean

[Emil]

Ti story was updated it's not as bad as it seems for us in the membership business.

[gotonudecom]

The last sentence of the article posted by thebutcher, is below.
Obviously, this article updated after this thread started. Then most people just read what was posted and did not visit the link to read for themselves. Those that did, obviously did not understand the cryptic post.

My first read through did not lead me to believe it had anything to do with our industry, but I can see how it would have lead many to believe this. So did the post authors, thus the update the same day.

This reaction to the original post is caused many people's lack of doing their due diligence and helped create a reactionary opinion. This is an example of why you don't yell fire in a theater. reactionary opinions are very hard to change. Especially in lower IQ individuals. Thankfully we only have a few of those on this board.

The keywords are "physical products".

Are you selling a "physical product"? NO, then this does not affect you.
Yes, you are selling a "physical product". Is it skincare, healthcare, etc? NO, then this does not affect you.

It is a good thing to read the full articles before creating an opinion and then do some more research. The author of the post could be misinformed, just not write well or have an alternative goal. Like misleading people so their post goes viral and their site receives more traffic.

*This blog was updated on January 17, 2019 to clarify that the rule change is applicable to physical products such as skincare, healthcare items etc.

what you mean

[bbwlover]

It won't be affecting us so all is well then, time to move on.

[JBX]

It won't be affecting us so all is well then, time to move on.

Good to read this update here

[misterporn]

Still not good news for merchants selling good