We are going back to the moon as of today

[TheButcher]

One day the moon landing data will be released, unless they lost it like they did the technology to go there in the first place.

The same time as the JKF data

[Affman]

No one else has been able to land humans on the moon does that give you a clue why?

[tacnet]

Then someone please explain to me how all the equipment that we can see on the lunar surface TODAY got there ??? In the last 10 years, the Apollo landing sites have been photographed numerous times from lunar orbit by multiple countries including China, Russia, India, Japan and the USA. And its not just the lunar modules. Apollo 12, for example, setup a mirror that we bounce a laser off every few minutes (for the last 50 years) to accurately measure the distance to the moon. There's seismometers that measure moon quakes and transmit the data back to earth. We can even see the tracks where the lunar rovers were driven as in the photograph below (taken in 2010)



Don't forget, this is 250,000 miles away so its not like flying a drone. The signal takes way to long to get to the moon and back so everything would have to be pre-programmed and this is at a time BEFORE we had computers. We struggle to land autonomously on the moon today. Just in the last 5 years alone Japan, USA, Russia, China, Israel and India have all crashed on the moon......and that's with today's computing power

The truth is its FAR easier to land on the moon if you have someone piloting the spacecraft. The idea that 50 years ago, when computers were about as powerful as your average calculator, they managed to land on the moon multiple times, unpack everything, drive the rovers around all without ANY human input is just ludicrous.

[tacnet]

Good point

Ha ha. Because the tyres are on rock !!! How did they get the footprints next to it then ???? You can see them next to the front and back wheels. And what about the obvious wear on the tyres ??

Are you seriously suggesting that in 1969 (before computers, CGI or anything like that) they managed to build a lunar landing module that not only landed without any human input, it also managed to unpack itself, then drive the lunar rover some 50 yards away and place footprints all round the area ???

Give up man. Stop trying to blindly cling to your conspiracy theory and accept the truth

This is why most of us can not Believe what you type, so often.

There are FN boot prints. so the 5 ton vehicle can not leave tracks but a man can?

This has been debunked so many times that its hardly worth explaining yet again but here goes. Look where the footprints are ???? Unlike a car, the wheels of the Lunar Rover stick out to the sides. That means whenever the astronauts are getting into or out of the rover, they are standing on the tyre tracks !! The lunar surface is covered in a very fine dust (as Neil Armstrong said, its "almost like a powder"). That means the slightest step is going to kick up dust and cover any tyre tracks or imprints that were there before

Another conspiracy theory debunked !!!

[ispdn]

Ha ha. Because the tyres are on rock !!! How did they get the footprints next to it then ???? You can see them next to the front and back wheels. And what about the obvious wear on the tyres ??

Are you seriously suggesting that in 1969 (before computers, CGI or anything like that) they managed to build a lunar landing module that not only landed without any human input, it also managed to unpack itself, then drive the lunar rover some 50 yards away and place footprints all round the area ???

Give up man. Stop trying to blindly cling to your conspiracy theory and accept the truth

This is why most of us can not Believe what you type, so often.

There are FN boot prints. so the 5 ton vehicle can not leave tracks but a man can?

This has been debunked so many times that its hardly worth explaining yet again but here goes. Look where the footprints are ???? Unlike a car, the wheels of the Lunar Rover stick out to the sides. That means whenever the astronauts are getting into or out of the rover, they are standing on the tyre tracks !! The lunar surface is covered in a very fine dust (as Neil Armstrong said, its "almost like a powder"). That means the slightest step is going to kick up dust and cover any tyre tracks or imprints that were there before

Another conspiracy theory debunked !!!

Look behind the rear wheels and between the front and rear wheels, where are te foot prints that covered the tracks?

[Eroticart]

Okay where are the tracks no boot prints in front or behind it

[tacnet]

Okay where are the tracks no boot prints in front or behind it

Covered in dust !!! The moons surface is covered in a "fine powder" (as Neil Armstrong said) PLUS the moon has 1/6th earth's gravity so any movement is going to kick up dust and send it a long way. It was a major problem for the Apollo crews. Generally any boot prints you see will be the last ones before they get back into the rover. Any other tracks and boot prints get covered in dust

Are you suggesting this was done in a studio ???? Because if so, then there would STILL be tracks and they would be much more noticeable because of earth's stronger gravity. Or are you suggesting the picture is fake ?? Remember this is the 1960s, before computers so the only way to fake a picture was to physically cut it out and stick it together. They've done a remarkably good job with EVERY picture if that's the case

Now answer my questions. How did all the equipment we can see today on the moon get up there ???? We couldn't possibly have landed and unpacked it all autonomously. This was back when the most advanced computers had 16k of memory and were about as powerful as the average calculator today. Plus its too far to pilot remotely as the signal would take too long to get there and back. So how did it get all there ????

How come multiple countries have photographed lunar rover tracks TODAY ????? Are you seriously suggesting that 60 years later, America has somehow persuaded these countries to continue to fake pictures from lunar orbit, just to keep this hoax ????



How come we know that the lunar surface is covered in Helium 3 (hence why several countries are now racing to return to the moon) if not for the nearly 800 pounds of lunar samples returned by the Apollo astronauts ???? Again you can't remotely pilot a space craft (like a drone) across 250,000 miles to grab some rocks and fly them all the way back to earth and we didn't have the computers to do it. So how did we get those rocks ???

The problem with conspiracy theorists is that you will pick on one thing (eg Wheres the rover tracks ??) and then when that gets debunked, you will come back with another thing, and another, and another but you NEVER explain the gaping holes in your theory

[tacnet]

MKUltra (CIA mind control experiments using LSD, hypnosis, etc., on unwitting subjects) — Dismissed as sci-fi paranoia until 1975 Church Committee hearings and surviving documents confirmed it.

Tuskegee Syphilis Study (U.S. government withheld treatment from Black men with syphilis for decades) — Rumors circulated for years; proven in 1972 via leak, leading to a presidential apology in 1997.

COINTELPRO (FBI program to surveil, infiltrate, discredit, and disrupt civil rights/anti-war groups, including targeting MLK) — Denied until 1971 burglary of FBI offices exposed files, confirmed by Senate investigations.

Operation Northwoods (1960s U.S. military proposal for false-flag attacks on Americans to justify invading Cuba) — Declassified in the 1990s; the plan existed but was rejected.

Watergate (Nixon White House cover-up and break-in) — Initially dismissed as third-rate burglary; tapes and investigations proved a broader conspiracy.

Big Tobacco conspiracy (Cigarette companies knew smoking caused cancer/addiction since the 1950s but hid/suppressed evidence and lied publicly) — Proven via 1990s internal document releases and lawsuits.

Operation Mockingbird (CIA influence/recruitment of journalists and media outlets for propaganda) — Partially confirmed through 1970s investigations and declassifications (extent debated, but core elements real).

PRISM/NSA mass surveillance (bulk collection of internet/phone data on citizens) — Long-rumored; Snowden leaks in 2013 proved it, showing official denials were false.

Gulf of Tonkin incident (exaggerated/false reports used to escalate Vietnam War) — Declassified docs in later decades showed manipulation.

Operation Paperclip (U.S. recruited Nazi scientists post-WWII, ignoring war crimes) — Denied/minimized until declassifications confirmed it.

And how do you know about all these alleged conspiracies ???? BECAUSE THE TRUTH CAME OUT !!!. It's been nearly 60 years and NOBODY has come forward and said "yes we faked it and here's the proof"

PS. Don't forget all the conspiracies that were NOT true eg Bigfoot, Roswell Aliens, Covid being spread by 5G, Pizzagate, Bill Gates putting a tracker in the covid vaccine, CIA behind 9/11, Chemtrails controlling the weather etc etc

[gotonudecom]

MKUltra (CIA mind control experiments using LSD, hypnosis, etc., on unwitting subjects) — Dismissed as sci-fi paranoia until 1975 Church Committee hearings and surviving documents confirmed it.

Tuskegee Syphilis Study (U.S. government withheld treatment from Black men with syphilis for decades) — Rumors circulated for years; proven in 1972 via leak, leading to a presidential apology in 1997.

COINTELPRO (FBI program to surveil, infiltrate, discredit, and disrupt civil rights/anti-war groups, including targeting MLK) — Denied until 1971 burglary of FBI offices exposed files, confirmed by Senate investigations.

Operation Northwoods (1960s U.S. military proposal for false-flag attacks on Americans to justify invading Cuba) — Declassified in the 1990s; the plan existed but was rejected.

Watergate (Nixon White House cover-up and break-in) — Initially dismissed as third-rate burglary; tapes and investigations proved a broader conspiracy.

Big Tobacco conspiracy (Cigarette companies knew smoking caused cancer/addiction since the 1950s but hid/suppressed evidence and lied publicly) — Proven via 1990s internal document releases and lawsuits.

Operation Mockingbird (CIA influence/recruitment of journalists and media outlets for propaganda) — Partially confirmed through 1970s investigations and declassifications (extent debated, but core elements real).

PRISM/NSA mass surveillance (bulk collection of internet/phone data on citizens) — Long-rumored; Snowden leaks in 2013 proved it, showing official denials were false.

Gulf of Tonkin incident (exaggerated/false reports used to escalate Vietnam War) — Declassified docs in later decades showed manipulation.

Operation Paperclip (U.S. recruited Nazi scientists post-WWII, ignoring war crimes) — Denied/minimized until declassifications confirmed it.

And how do you know about all these alleged conspiracies ???? BECAUSE THE TRUTH CAME OUT !!!. It's been nearly 60 years and NOBODY has come forward and said "yes we faked it and here's the proof"

PS. Don't forget all the conspiracies that were NOT true eg Bigfoot, Roswell Aliens, Covid being spread by 5G, Pizzagate, Bill Gates putting a tracker in the covid vaccine, CIA behind 9/11, Chemtrails controlling the weather etc etc

BIG FOOT is real.

Covid being spread by 5G Had not heard that. Too much even for me!
LOL!


Roswell Aliens, you obviously do not want senate hearings.
Do you really believe that you know enough about a subject to know you are correct?

Do you know when you do not know enough about a subject to know when you are wrong?


Pizzagate, that one is fun to watch, all sides taking pokes at it. I certainly hope this one has people a little more concerned with security.
We are all being watched.

Bill Gates putting a tracker in the covid vaccine. I hope not!

Are you attempting to be difficult?


Without conspiracies the truth or someone's controlled version of the truth would never come out.
People could run amuck with zero accountability.

This is the epitome of how and what the human race must do to survive.

Leaps and bounds in civilization are created by the outliers. The people that do not follow blindly into the night.


BIG FOOT LIVES!!!

http://bigfootisreal.com

[misterporn]

There is a new tentative launch date for Artemis 2, it is April 1st 2026.

[24alex]

There is a new tentative launch date for Artemis 2, it is April 1st 2026.

Let's wait and see

[BrasSmonkey]

There is a new tentative launch date for Artemis 2, it is April 1st 2026.

[Webby]

Artemis 2 has reached the launch pad and is still set for an April 1st launch date.

[Brian]

Is it still going to the moon on April 1st?

[Matty2]

A moon base is going to become reality one day



https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/24/science/ ... -moon-base