Trump said he will “stop the transgender lunacy” on day one

[fappmaster]

His base will be happy

[rx_tom]

Not sure how true this is, but toy get a passport you have to check male or female, the "X" option is gone, can any body verify this. The same for a birth certificate.

[chilli.domains]

mike tyson beat females! imagine him going trans to fight females!!! that would be the biggest ppv sold!!!

It's not about sexuality but biological men in women's sports, I am against that. Why is there a wnba and a nba, why don't men and women compete in one league. It's simple men have bigger build and stronger muscles. You put women in the nba and guess who will win.

True but most sports already have gender separation. Thats why you dont see men and women boxing or playing in football leagues together. NOBODY is suggesting that Mike Tyson should be allowed to beat up females or that women should be allowed in the NBA. That's just Trump trying to paint the democrats as radical nuts. All this crap about getting transgenders out of the military, out of schools etc is just pure and simple discrimination.

A person should not be judged on their sexuality because they don't have any choice over it. Just like they don't have any choice of the color of their skin

"Thats why you dont see men and women boxing or playing in football leagues together."
Have you missed the times trans women were in womens' competitions?

[TheButcher]

Someone sent me this link from July 25th 2023.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... -in-russia

"Vladimir Putin signs law banning gender changes in Russia
Legislation outlaws medical interventions ‘aimed at changing the sex of a person’ and altering gender details in public records"

[badkitty]

SCOTUS judges ruled in Trump favor.




https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/06/politics ... ce-members




"The Supreme Court said Tuesday that the Trump administration can begin immediately enforcing a ban on transgender service members in the military.

The decision is a major victory for President Donald Trump in his effort to get the high court to unlock various parts of his second-term agenda that have been held up by lower courts reviewing scores of legal challenges to his policies.

As is often the case in emergency rulings, the court did not explain its reasoning. The three liberal justices publicly dissented from the decision, but also did not explain their position. "