[LOL] to tacamateurs and musk....

[BrasSmonkey]

you mean opps somebody tested it....

How did they mix that thing up?

[tacnet]

you mean opps somebody tested it....

How did they mix that thing up?

Its obvious. Read the page https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

The guy says he couldn't remember the details but he received the rock as a private gift from the US ambassador and it happened to coincide with a visit by the Apollo 11 astronaughts. He then donated the rock to the museum who wrongly assumed it was a piece of moon rock

NASA are not stupid. They are not trying to pass off 500 million year old petrified wood as 4.5 billion year old moon rock. Anybody with a microscope would have spotted that immediatly

Its just another stupid conspiracy theory that has been debunked many times over the years but conspiracy theorists like to cling on to it

[BrasSmonkey]

NASA has no current documented proof of a moon landing! is that a lie rocketman???

you mean opps somebody tested it....

How did they mix that thing up?

Its obvious. Read the page https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

The guy says he couldn't remember the details but he received the rock as a private gift from the US ambassador and it happened to coincide with a visit by the Apollo 11 astronaughts. He then donated the rock to the museum who wrongly assumed it was a piece of moon rock

NASA are not stupid. They are not trying to pass off 500 million year old petrified wood as 4.5 billion year old moon rock. Anybody with a microscope would have spotted that immediatly

Its just another stupid conspiracy theory that has been debunked many times over the years but conspiracy theorists like to cling on to it

[tacnet]

NASA has no current documented proof of a moon landing! is that a lie rocketman???

you mean opps somebody tested it....

Its obvious. Read the page https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

The guy says he couldn't remember the details but he received the rock as a private gift from the US ambassador and it happened to coincide with a visit by the Apollo 11 astronaughts. He then donated the rock to the museum who wrongly assumed it was a piece of moon rock

NASA are not stupid. They are not trying to pass off 500 million year old petrified wood as 4.5 billion year old moon rock. Anybody with a microscope would have spotted that immediatly

Its just another stupid conspiracy theory that has been debunked many times over the years but conspiracy theorists like to cling on to it

There's plenty of documented proof. Russia, China, India and Japan have all imaged the Apollo moon landing sites using their own lunar orbiters. And then there's all the moon rocks that have been studied by thousands of scientists all over the world

What there is NO DOCUMENTED PROOF of is that its all a big conspiracy !!

None of you conspiracy theorists have answered my question about the moon landings. You all avoid it because you know you cant answer it

How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

[BrasSmonkey]

show me the vlog of the manned mission.

NASA has no current documented proof of a moon landing! is that a lie rocketman???

Its obvious. Read the page https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

The guy says he couldn't remember the details but he received the rock as a private gift from the US ambassador and it happened to coincide with a visit by the Apollo 11 astronaughts. He then donated the rock to the museum who wrongly assumed it was a piece of moon rock

NASA are not stupid. They are not trying to pass off 500 million year old petrified wood as 4.5 billion year old moon rock. Anybody with a microscope would have spotted that immediatly

Its just another stupid conspiracy theory that has been debunked many times over the years but conspiracy theorists like to cling on to it

There's plenty of documented proof. Russia, China, India and Japan have all imaged the Apollo moon landing sites using their own lunar orbiters. And then there's all the moon rocks that have been studied by thousands of scientists all over the world

What there is NO DOCUMENTED PROOF of is that its all a big conspiracy !!

None of you conspiracy theorists have answered my question about the moon landings. You all avoid it because you know you cant answer it

How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

[greatpornlinks]

How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

This is the only part that can not be explained by those who say we never put a man on the moon, you can not tell me one in 400K did not open their mouth spill the beans if we never went to the moon. I still agree that the tech was not available to put men on the moon 6 times in such a short period of time.

[BrasSmonkey]

illuminati!!!

How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

This is the only part that can not be explained by those who say we never put a man on the moon, you can not tell me one in 400K did not open their mouth spill the beans if we never went to the moon. I still agree that the tech was not available to put men on the moon 6 times in such a short period of time.

[tacnet]

illuminati!!!

How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

This is the only part that can not be explained by those who say we never put a man on the moon, you can not tell me one in 400K did not open their mouth spill the beans if we never went to the moon. I still agree that the tech was not available to put men on the moon 6 times in such a short period of time.

That says it all right there. To suggest that the Illuminati (a group that operated for less than a decade back in the 1700's) managed to fake the moon landings and then get 400,000 people to keep it a secret for over 50 years is as ridiculous as it sounds.

It just shows the lengths that conspiracy theorists will go to so as not to admit they are WRONG !!!!

[BrasSmonkey]

there was no moon landing. you believe ev is a success with no basic structure.... omg!!!!

illuminati!!!

This is the only part that can not be explained by those who say we never put a man on the moon, you can not tell me one in 400K did not open their mouth spill the beans if we never went to the moon. I still agree that the tech was not available to put men on the moon 6 times in such a short period of time.

That says it all right there. To suggest that the Illuminati (a group that operated for less than a decade back in the 1700's) managed to fake the moon landings and then get 400,000 people to keep it a secret for over 50 years is as ridiculous as it sounds.

It just shows the lengths that conspiracy theorists will go to so as not to admit they are WRONG !!!!

[alsporn]

there was no moon landing. you believe ev is a success with no basic structure.... omg!!!!

illuminati!!!

That says it all right there. To suggest that the Illuminati (a group that operated for less than a decade back in the 1700's) managed to fake the moon landings and then get 400,000 people to keep it a secret for over 50 years is as ridiculous as it sounds.

It just shows the lengths that conspiracy theorists will go to so as not to admit they are WRONG !!!!

None of it makes sense they lost or destroyed so much of the Apollo blue prints and film reels, why did they do that.

[tacnet]

there was no moon landing. you believe ev is a success with no basic structure.... omg!!!!

That says it all right there. To suggest that the Illuminati (a group that operated for less than a decade back in the 1700's) managed to fake the moon landings and then get 400,000 people to keep it a secret for over 50 years is as ridiculous as it sounds.

It just shows the lengths that conspiracy theorists will go to so as not to admit they are WRONG !!!!

None of it makes sense they lost or destroyed so much of the Apollo blue prints and film reels, why did they do that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes

What happened is there was limited bandwidth for the TV signal coming from the moon (because of all the other telemetry data being transmitted) so the Apollo 11 moonwalk was transmitted back to earth at 10 frames per second and 320 lines resolution. The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards and therefore it needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. As this was a live broadcast, the conversion needed to be done in real time.

In case the live conversion didn't work, there was a backup recorded on film but the live conversion DID work and therefore the backups were no longer needed. Nearly 40 years later in 2006, a reporter tried to find the original backup tapes and they had couldn't find them but you can understand why seeing as nobody thought they would be needed anymore and nearly 40 years had gone by

By the way, the original recordings of all the other moon landings DO exist

I'll ask my question again seeing as nobody has answered it. If you believe this was a fake then please explain How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

[BrasSmonkey]

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

there was no moon landing. you believe ev is a success with no basic structure.... omg!!!!

None of it makes sense they lost or destroyed so much of the Apollo blue prints and film reels, why did they do that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes

What happened is there was limited bandwidth for the TV signal coming from the moon (because of all the other telemetry data being transmitted) so the Apollo 11 moonwalk was transmitted back to earth at 10 frames per second and 320 lines resolution. The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards and therefore it needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. As this was a live broadcast, the conversion needed to be done in real time.

In case the live conversion didn't work, there was a backup recorded on film but the live conversion DID work and therefore the backups were no longer needed. Nearly 40 years later in 2006, a reporter tried to find the original backup tapes and they had couldn't find them but you can understand why seeing as nobody thought they would be needed anymore and nearly 40 years had gone by

By the way, the original recordings of all the other moon landings DO exist

I'll ask my question again seeing as nobody has answered it. If you believe this was a fake then please explain How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

[tacnet]

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

None of it makes sense they lost or destroyed so much of the Apollo blue prints and film reels, why did they do that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes

What happened is there was limited bandwidth for the TV signal coming from the moon (because of all the other telemetry data being transmitted) so the Apollo 11 moonwalk was transmitted back to earth at 10 frames per second and 320 lines resolution. The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards and therefore it needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. As this was a live broadcast, the conversion needed to be done in real time.

In case the live conversion didn't work, there was a backup recorded on film but the live conversion DID work and therefore the backups were no longer needed. Nearly 40 years later in 2006, a reporter tried to find the original backup tapes and they had couldn't find them but you can understand why seeing as nobody thought they would be needed anymore and nearly 40 years had gone by

By the way, the original recordings of all the other moon landings DO exist

I'll ask my question again seeing as nobody has answered it. If you believe this was a fake then please explain How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

You seriously think that this is proof that they faked the landings???? If NASA were sophisticated enough to fake the rocket launches, then fake the radio communications and TV signals and all the other things they would have had to do to pull it off......that they wouldn''t also be able fake a few film reels ???

You are so gullible !!

[BrasSmonkey]

I do not believe the government! if they did it once they would be claiming shit on the moon! ok rocketman imma leave you to this.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes

What happened is there was limited bandwidth for the TV signal coming from the moon (because of all the other telemetry data being transmitted) so the Apollo 11 moonwalk was transmitted back to earth at 10 frames per second and 320 lines resolution. The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards and therefore it needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. As this was a live broadcast, the conversion needed to be done in real time.

In case the live conversion didn't work, there was a backup recorded on film but the live conversion DID work and therefore the backups were no longer needed. Nearly 40 years later in 2006, a reporter tried to find the original backup tapes and they had couldn't find them but you can understand why seeing as nobody thought they would be needed anymore and nearly 40 years had gone by

By the way, the original recordings of all the other moon landings DO exist

I'll ask my question again seeing as nobody has answered it. If you believe this was a fake then please explain How do you get 400,000 people to keep a secret that big for over 50 years ????

You seriously think that this is proof that they faked the landings???? If NASA were sophisticated enough to fake the rocket launches, then fake the radio communications and TV signals and all the other things they would have had to do to pull it off......that they wouldn''t also be able fake a few film reels ???

You are so gullible !!

[LookyLou]

No way Jose it was not real based on the computers we had at the time. That bull crap of astronauts using sextants looking out the window to check their location and make adjustments based on the position of the stars is one big lie