Who's using .webp over .jpg ?

[cimage]

not doing it...

Your loss. Since we've done it our page speed scores are up over 95% and its given us a real boost in google traffic

What more do I need to read to convince me this is a worth while thing for me to do

I use a lot of images on my blogs, this is a god send.

[tacnet]

not doing it...

Your loss. Since we've done it our page speed scores are up over 95% and its given us a real boost in google traffic

What more do I need to read to convince me this is a worth while thing for me to do

I use a lot of images on my blogs, this is a god send.

If you want to know if your site will benefit from using .webp then just test it with Google Page Speed Insights https://pagespeed.web.dev/

[Abby]

Sorry if this is a stupid question,some of my images are ".png" will they still have the same characteristics when I convert them to ".webp"

[tacnet]

Sorry if this is a stupid question,some of my images are ".png" will they still have the same characteristics when I convert them to ".webp"

Yes .webp can do transparencies just like .png

see https://www.nchsoftware.com/imageconverter/index.html

[Abby]

Sorry if this is a stupid question,some of my images are ".png" will they still have the same characteristics when I convert them to ".webp"

Yes .webp can do transparencies just like .png

see https://www.nchsoftware.com/imageconverter/index.html

thank you for the reply that is what i wanted to know

[BrasSmonkey]

not doing it...

Your loss. Since we've done it our page speed scores are up over 95% and its given us a real boost in google traffic

What more do I need to read to convince me this is a worth while thing for me to do

I use a lot of images on my blogs, this is a god send.

like i fucking care

[ispdn]

webp and webm are the future

[tacnet]

Your loss. Since we've done it our page speed scores are up over 95% and its given us a real boost in google traffic

What more do I need to read to convince me this is a worth while thing for me to do

I use a lot of images on my blogs, this is a god send.

like i fucking care

Really don't get what you've got against .webp

Its easy to imlement with Google's webp on your server or something like Pixillion on your desktop, it has over 97.6% browser support and it can have a HUGE impact your on your search rankings.

Why WOULDN'T you want to do it ?

[BrasSmonkey]

What more do I need to read to convince me this is a worth while thing for me to do

I use a lot of images on my blogs, this is a god send.

like i fucking care

Really don't get what you've got against .webp

Its easy to imlement with Google's webp on your server or something like Pixillion on your desktop, it has over 97.6% browser support and it can have a HUGE impact your on your search rankings.

Why WOULDN'T you want to do it ?

im not switching neither did the top places on google.