First case of Copyright for images made using AI

[nudelinks]

It was bound to be taken up for copyright and the first case has been for the human touch not AI generated images.


"Feb 22 (Reuters) - Images in a graphic novel that were created using the artificial-intelligence system Midjourney should not have been granted copyright protection, the U.S. Copyright Office said in a letter seen by Reuters."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-create ... 023-02-22/

[fappmaster]

If I read it right this is a bad ruling for people using AI to crate content

[BOB777]

Lawyers will be making money from AI

[pussylover]

Lawyers will be making money from AI

You bet they will

[deviantz]

This is the beginning and things will evolve as time goes on.

[HeidiHoe]

There's also lawsuits pending against AI. Copyright protected images were used to train AI. What happens now depends on the court ruling whether the AI creation is a derivative (protected) or transformative ( not protected) work.

[LuKenGas]

Well someone used AI to generate the content that is the same as taking the photograph or writing the text if ya ask me.

[ispdn]

Well someone used AI to generate the content that is the same as taking the photograph or writing the text if ya ask me.

I guess that is one way to think of AI content

[misterporn]

As more and more cases go to trial precedents will be set and that will determine the future or copyright laws doe AI content, this will take some time.

[3ric]

As more and more cases go to trial precedents will be set and that will determine the future or copyright laws doe AI content, this will take some time.

IP lawyers will have a field day and make bags full of money, I wish I was a lawyer.