SEO - Google: No Difference In SEO Value Between Nofollow, UGC Or Sponsored Link Attributes

[bill]

https://www.seroundtable.com/google-seo ... 32672.html

[TheButcher]

The sponsored surprises me but if John Mueller says so it is what it is.

[24alex]

when did this change I thought Google had a thing for paid links.

[lustxseo]

The change only affected the way they're categorized, you can still view them all as nofollow. Though I think it will eventually impact rankings once they become widespread enough.

[alina]

so do we change anything or carry on as is

[lustxseo]

so do we change anything or carry on as is

You don't have to, there's nothing to gain or lose.

[Colmike7]

It's because all three are equally worthless for SEO

[shoopa]

It's because all three are equally worthless for SEO

Really

[Colmike7]

It's because all three are equally worthless for SEO

Really

Yeah

"In terms of the difference in SEO value, there is no such thing, they all do the same thing - which is not pass any link value from the source page."

[Gaming_Mike]

Hi Bill what is new with you

[AlexO]

It's because all three are equally worthless for SEO

I got to your post and saw you already said what I was about to say

[Sammy]

If you think about this it is only logical.

[fappmaster]

It is good news for link sellers and link buyers

[webcamhostess]

It is good news for link sellers and link buyers

and I always tried to hide the fact I have bought links

[pussyhunter]

The no follow and paid links surprised me