[BUSINESS] Europe just fined Google another €1.5bn
- TheButcher
- Administrator

- Posts: 17527
- Joined: February 2nd, 2018, 11:48 am
- Title: I like weekends
- Referrals: 1
- Contact:
[BUSINESS] Europe just fined Google another €1.5bn
Europe can stop taxing their people just keep on fining major corporations, they are going for big bucks with companies, this is huge €1.5bn.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... violations
"Google has been fined €1.5bn (£1.3bn) by the EU for abusing its monopoly in online advertising, bringing the total cost of punishments imposed on the search giant by Brussels to €8.2bn over two years.
The latest ruling means that since 2017 the EU has found Google abused its power in shopping comparison services, its Android mobile phone operating system and now search adverts.
The €1.5bn fine relates to the contracts Google forced businesses to sign if they wanted to use the company’s technology to provide search functions on their own websites. Companies could also run adverts alongside those results using Google’s AdSense for Search, but the EU said Google used the feature to muscle out competitors.
Advertisement
The misconduct included stopping publishers placing search adverts from competitors on their results pages, forcing them to reserve the most profitable space for Google’s adverts and a requirement to seek written approval before making changes to how rival adverts were displayed.
Commenting on Wednesday’s decision, Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s competition commissioner, said: “Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anticompetitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules. The misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to compete on the merits and to innovate – and consumers the benefits of competition.”
Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more
The AdSense advertising case was triggered by a complaint from Microsoft in 2010. Both companies subsequently dropped complaints against each other in 2016. Google stopped the practices at the centre of the EU fine in 2016, meaning that, so long as it does not restart the exclusivity requirements, the punishment, which represents 1.3% of its turnover in 2018, should be the end of the matter.
“Google’s practices covered over half the market by turnover throughout most of the period,” the competition commission said. “Google’s rivals were not able to compete on the merits, either because there was an outright prohibition for them to appear on publisher websites or because Google reserved for itself by far the most valuable commercial space on those websites, while at the same time controlling how rival search adverts could appear.”
In a statement, the company said: “We’ve always agreed that healthy, thriving markets are in everyone’s interest. We’ve already made a wide range of changes to our products to address the commission’s concerns. Over the next few months, we’ll be making further updates to give more visibility to rivals in Europe.”
The €1.5bn charge is the smallest of the three EU fines the company has received.
In June 2017, it was fined €2.4bn for pushing its Google Shopping service on to search engine users in a way that harmed the wider price comparison market.
A year later, it was fined €4.3bn for illegally tying its Android operating system to a raft of other requirements, preventing handset manufacturers from shipping phones without pre-installing Google’s search and browser apps.
The fines are unlikely to change Google’s behaviour without stronger enforcement, said Thomas Vinje, an antitrust partner at law firm Clifford Chance who represented Fairsearch, a group of companies that gave evidence against the company in previous European commission investigations.
He said: “Fines get headlines but frankly are close to irrelevant. It’s changes to business conduct that are important.”
Google is likely to face further competition actions, particularly over its dominance in building detailed profiles of users, Vinje added.
Wednesday’s fine landed on the same day Google announced a capitulation to the EU’s requirements stipulated in the Android ruling. The company will now offer European Android users a choice over what browser and search engine they use, forcing a selection from both new and existing users.
The policy follows other requirements placed upon manufacturers last October, which allowed them to pre-install other search engines and browsers for European users and still offer the rest of the Google application suite if they paid the company a fee, to replace the income Google says is provided by the pre-installation of Search and Chrome."
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... violations
"Google has been fined €1.5bn (£1.3bn) by the EU for abusing its monopoly in online advertising, bringing the total cost of punishments imposed on the search giant by Brussels to €8.2bn over two years.
The latest ruling means that since 2017 the EU has found Google abused its power in shopping comparison services, its Android mobile phone operating system and now search adverts.
The €1.5bn fine relates to the contracts Google forced businesses to sign if they wanted to use the company’s technology to provide search functions on their own websites. Companies could also run adverts alongside those results using Google’s AdSense for Search, but the EU said Google used the feature to muscle out competitors.
Advertisement
The misconduct included stopping publishers placing search adverts from competitors on their results pages, forcing them to reserve the most profitable space for Google’s adverts and a requirement to seek written approval before making changes to how rival adverts were displayed.
Commenting on Wednesday’s decision, Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s competition commissioner, said: “Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anticompetitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules. The misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to compete on the merits and to innovate – and consumers the benefits of competition.”
Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more
The AdSense advertising case was triggered by a complaint from Microsoft in 2010. Both companies subsequently dropped complaints against each other in 2016. Google stopped the practices at the centre of the EU fine in 2016, meaning that, so long as it does not restart the exclusivity requirements, the punishment, which represents 1.3% of its turnover in 2018, should be the end of the matter.
“Google’s practices covered over half the market by turnover throughout most of the period,” the competition commission said. “Google’s rivals were not able to compete on the merits, either because there was an outright prohibition for them to appear on publisher websites or because Google reserved for itself by far the most valuable commercial space on those websites, while at the same time controlling how rival search adverts could appear.”
In a statement, the company said: “We’ve always agreed that healthy, thriving markets are in everyone’s interest. We’ve already made a wide range of changes to our products to address the commission’s concerns. Over the next few months, we’ll be making further updates to give more visibility to rivals in Europe.”
The €1.5bn charge is the smallest of the three EU fines the company has received.
In June 2017, it was fined €2.4bn for pushing its Google Shopping service on to search engine users in a way that harmed the wider price comparison market.
A year later, it was fined €4.3bn for illegally tying its Android operating system to a raft of other requirements, preventing handset manufacturers from shipping phones without pre-installing Google’s search and browser apps.
The fines are unlikely to change Google’s behaviour without stronger enforcement, said Thomas Vinje, an antitrust partner at law firm Clifford Chance who represented Fairsearch, a group of companies that gave evidence against the company in previous European commission investigations.
He said: “Fines get headlines but frankly are close to irrelevant. It’s changes to business conduct that are important.”
Google is likely to face further competition actions, particularly over its dominance in building detailed profiles of users, Vinje added.
Wednesday’s fine landed on the same day Google announced a capitulation to the EU’s requirements stipulated in the Android ruling. The company will now offer European Android users a choice over what browser and search engine they use, forcing a selection from both new and existing users.
The policy follows other requirements placed upon manufacturers last October, which allowed them to pre-install other search engines and browsers for European users and still offer the rest of the Google application suite if they paid the company a fee, to replace the income Google says is provided by the pre-installation of Search and Chrome."
- Russ
- Verified Member

- Posts: 1282
- Joined: March 4th, 2018, 7:44 am
-
JBX
- Verified Member

- Posts: 205
- Joined: July 6th, 2018, 6:35 pm
That is not the point, they are going too far with this anti-trust shit every where.
- jag
- Verified Member

- Posts: 6534
- Joined: February 15th, 2018, 9:51 am
- Title: From Malta with love
- Referrals: 1
Google needs some checks or else no other search engine will have a chance to grow.
From Malta with love and sunshine
-
wetnwild
- Verified Member

- Posts: 681
- Joined: March 15th, 2018, 9:33 am
- cimage
- Verified Member

- Posts: 1592
- Joined: June 3rd, 2018, 2:36 pm
- Title: living the good life
No matter how you slice it, that is serious money right there.
Stop looking for reps if they don't care why waste your time and traffic at their program, fuck that.
~ cimage 2024
~ cimage 2024
- AlexO
- Verified Member

- Posts: 6400
- Joined: February 10th, 2018, 5:37 pm
- Title: I like Celebrities
Word
Give me celebrity porn 
- bbwlover
- Verified Member

- Posts: 1043
- Joined: March 5th, 2018, 6:23 pm
You know how much money Google makes a year, that is peanuts for them.
-
calista
- Verified Member

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: February 20th, 2018, 6:15 pm
- Title: Manila Babe
How do they set these fine amounts, is it based on how much the other person or company can afford?
-
moma
- Verified Member

- Posts: 87
- Joined: July 13th, 2018, 12:14 pm
You know how many homeless people could live if they put some of this money into charities.
-
pornmafia
- Verified Member

- Posts: 1303
- Joined: March 4th, 2018, 12:14 pm
Every body wants a piece of the action in one way or another.
- TheButcher
- Administrator

- Posts: 17527
- Joined: February 2nd, 2018, 11:48 am
- Title: I like weekends
- Referrals: 1
- Contact:
Amen
- trafficseller
- Verified Member

- Posts: 1142
- Joined: March 1st, 2018, 6:44 pm
Christmas came early to the European Union coffers
Always looking to make deals with world wide traffic ping me if inetrested
-
plumpprincessxxx
- Verified Member

- Posts: 228
- Joined: November 14th, 2018, 9:56 pm
Do they realize chasing away business hurts them in the long run?
-
dom_trev
- Verified Member

- Posts: 937
- Joined: February 16th, 2018, 4:42 pm
- Referrals: 41
Nothing to be happy about, the end user ends up paying for fines and expenses on nearly all sites