California jury finds Elon Musk defrauded investors on his $44 Billion purchase of Twitter

Discussion Of All Legal Topics Is Fine Anything Goes. Be Respectful of Others. No Personal Information or Attacks.
All Traffic, Link, Banner, Push Notification and Advertising, Offers & Requests Here,.
Domains & Websites For Sale and Requests Here.
Keep One thread per person & No More Than 1 Weekly Bump.
Post Reply
User avatar
AlexO
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 6390
Joined: February 10th, 2018, 5:37 pm
Title: I like Celebrities

California jury finds Elon Musk defrauded investors on his $44 Billion purchase of Twitter

#1

Post by AlexO » March 22nd, 2026, 11:42 am

The lawyers are going to have up to a $2.6 billion pay day

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/20/elon-mu ... stors.html


"A jury in California found that Elon Musk defrauded Twitter shareholders during the runup to his $44 billion acquisition of the social media company, according to a verdict issued on Friday.

Total damages could reach up to $2.6 billion, attorneys for the plaintiffs said.

The class action lawsuit, Pampena v. Musk, was originally filed in October 2022, after Musk completed his purchase of Twitter for $54.20 per share. He later renamed the company X, before merging it with his artificial intelligence company xAI, and then with SpaceX, his reusable rocket manufacturer.

“This is a great example of what you cannot do to the average investor -- people that have 401ks, kids, pension funds, teachers, firemen, nurses,” Joseph Cotchett, an attorney for the Twitter investors, told CNBC at the San Francisco courthouse. “That’s what this case was all about. This was not about Musk. It was about the whole operation.”

In an emailed statement, Musk attorneys with Quinn Emanuel said, “We view today’s verdict, where the jury found both for and against the plaintiffs and found no fraud scheme, as a bump in the road. And we look forward to vindication on appeal.”

After Musk bid to buy Twitter in April 2022, his sentiment towards the deal quickly soured as he cast doubt on the company’s claimed level of bots, spam and fake accounts on its platform. Musk wrote in a tweet the following month that his acquisition was “temporarily on hold” until Twitter’s CEO could prove its inauthentic account levels were around the 5% reported in the company’s SEC filings.

Musk’s tweets and additional comments sent shares of Twitter sliding by almost 10% in a single session. The jury deliberated for four days and unanimously found that Musk’s tweets on May 13 and May 17 were materially false or misleading.

Former Twitter shareholders, including retail investors and options traders, argued that Musk’s remarks amounted to a scheme to pressure the company’s board to sell to him for a lower price than his original offer. They claimed he was motivated by stock price declines at Tesla, which would require him to sell even more shares in the automaker than he’d intended in order to finance the buyout.

The plaintiffs in the suit said they sold shares below $54.20 following and in response to Musk’s posts and comments during press interviews. The potential damages figure is based on expert estimates of how much Musk’s flip-flopping affected the share price during the class period.

Attorneys for the Twitter investors said it will be about 90 days before claims administration is set up, and it will then take a couple of months for the government to process claims and for investors to begin to recoup some of their losses.

Musk’s attorneys argued their client’s remarks were based on well-founded concerns about bots, spam and fake accounts on Twitter, and did not amount to securities fraud or a scheme to depress the company’s stock price.

The jury said that though Musk had made false and misleading statements that harmed some Twitter shareholders, he did not engage in a specific scheme to defraud investors.

While the verdict marks a stinging rebuke for Musk, the financial implications are minimal considering his net worth, which currently sits at about $650 billion, according to Bloomberg. "
Give me celebrity porn :twisted:

User avatar
jag
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 6524
Joined: February 15th, 2018, 9:51 am
Title: From Malta with love
Referrals: 1

#2

Post by jag » March 23rd, 2026, 6:14 am

How many lawyers and how much time does it take to get to $2.6 billion billable hours?
From Malta with love and sunshine

tittylove
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 96
Joined: April 9th, 2022, 11:00 am

#3

Post by tittylove » March 23rd, 2026, 10:06 am

What practical difference will this make after the fact




User avatar
shoopa
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 1850
Joined: February 26th, 2018, 7:32 pm

#4

Post by shoopa » March 24th, 2026, 2:14 am

Appeal time baby.




User avatar
TheButcher
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 17517
Joined: February 2nd, 2018, 11:48 am
Title: I like weekends
Referrals: 1
Contact:

#5

Post by TheButcher » March 24th, 2026, 8:25 pm

jag wrote: ↑
March 23rd, 2026, 6:14 am
How many lawyers and how much time does it take to get to $2.6 billion billable hours?
It'll be a nice Summer for some people :)

razor
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 1656
Joined: March 4th, 2018, 8:34 am

#6

Post by razor » March 25th, 2026, 12:47 pm

He will not lose any sleep over a few billion bucks




User avatar
mybitches
Verified Member
Verified Member
Posts: 539
Joined: January 4th, 2022, 6:44 am

#7

Post by mybitches » March 30th, 2026, 8:13 am

jag wrote: ↑
March 23rd, 2026, 6:14 am
How many lawyers and how much time does it take to get to $2.6 billion billable hours?


It's good for the economy think of all the high end cars and homes that will find buyers 5n9dd3
MY BITCHES

California jury finds Elon Musk defrauded investors on his $44 Billion purchase of Twitter

Post Reply