[BUSINESS] Image quality v file size

[AlexO]

No one appreciates low grade images even if it is on a free site

No arguments there how ever Google cares for fast loading pages over image quality, something to keep in mind.

Bulls eye!

[vblogger]

What do you consider a good trade off for image quality and file size. Where do you draw the line on size and quality for clarity and page load speed?

80% quality of original is good enough on a blog

[Ricks-Cams]

I wish some cam platforms would stop optimizing images for the sake of bandwidth.

[viking]

If you pay a few bucks more each month for a real capable server you can host higher quality images and have fast loading of your sites. You can not try save a buck and have good speed.

[koster]

I wish some cam platforms would stop optimizing images for the sake of bandwidth.

The smaller ones do it to save on bandwidth the bigger sites do not care about a few bucks of hosting.

[fetishnews]

Quality sells, quality gets you book markers.

[LuKenGas]

Quality sells, quality gets you book markers.

/thread

[monsta]

For free sites, make the darn pages load fast , no one including google likes a slow page.

[deviantz]

No one appreciates low grade images even if it is on a free site

No arguments there how ever Google cares for fast loading pages over image quality, something to keep in mind.

Not arguing here I agree with what you wrote

[voyeurz]

Quality is #1 in my book

[saucyadele]

The saying goes. Dress to impress and so I try use high use the best content on my blogs to get the viewers attention.

[cimage]

we sell content keep that in mind

[BOB777]

we sell content keep that in mind

word